Analysis10k / Blog
Reverse DCF · JPM

What JPM's Stock Price Is Really Betting On

The short answer

At today's price, JPMorgan's stock is pricing in only about 3.4% annual net-income growth for the next ten years. Over the past five years, the company's actual net income grew 14.4% a year — meaning the market is asking for far less than JPMorgan has already been delivering.

Bank-model adjustment A standard reverse DCF leans on "free cash flow" and "net debt" — concepts that don't translate cleanly to a bank, where deposits are the raw material for lending, not a debt to be subtracted. This card substitutes net income as the cash-flow proxy and skips the net-debt subtraction entirely — closer to a dividend-discount-style model. Every input and the full calculation are in the collapsible section below.
The conclusion

At its current price, JPM implies ~3.4% annual net-income growth for the next 10 years, discounted at 9%.

JPMorgan's actual 5-year (2020–2025) net-income growth averaged 14.4% a year.

Verdict: the market's expectations are well below the company's track record The gap here runs the opposite direction from a typical high-flying growth stock: JPMorgan's price implies a growth rate less than a quarter of its actual five-year pace. That's worth investigating — either the market doubts 14.4% growth is repeatable, or the stock is being priced conservatively for other reasons (rate cycle risk, credit-cost normalization, regulatory overhang).

Required growth vs. historical growth

Market's ask (WACC 9%)
3.4%
5-yr net-income CAGR
14.4%
5-yr revenue CAGR
8.8%

Required growth from the reverse DCF below. Historical CAGRs: 10-K FY2022, p.44 (2020 net income $29,131M) and 10-K FY2025, p.44 (2025 net income $57,048M).

Sensitivity: what if the discount rate or income base moves?

Required 10-year net-income growth by discount rate (WACC)
WACCRequired growth (FY2025 net income base)Required growth (TTM net income base)
8%1.18%0.36%
9% (base case)3.35%2.51%
10%5.35%4.47%
12%8.96%8.04%

At the base 9% discount rate, using the more recent trailing-twelve-month net income ($60.8B) instead of FY2025's audited figure ($57.0B) lowers the required growth rate from 3.35% to 2.51% — the better the recent results, the less future growth the market needs to assume. At a 12% discount rate, the required rate rises to nearly 9%, closer to the five-year revenue CAGR (8.8%).

What would move this number

  • Switching from FY2025 net income ($57.0B) to trailing-twelve-month net income ($60.8B) lowers the required growth rate from 3.35% to 2.51% at a 9% discount rate.
  • The 14.4% historical net-income CAGR isn't a clean baseline — it includes 2021 reserve releases (post-pandemic outlook improvement) and 2023's $2.8B First Republic bargain-purchase gain, both one-time boosts unlikely to repeat on a predictable schedule.
  • A more conservative 12% discount rate pushes the required growth rate to nearly 9% — close to the five-year revenue CAGR, which would put the valuation closer to "priced for steady-state growth" territory.

Show your work

Inputs, sources, model assumptions, and the calculation
  • Share price$360.84 — stockanalysis.com, Aug 18, 2026, 09:42 EDT
  • Market cap$959.18B — stockanalysis.com, same timestamp
  • FY2025 net income (audited)$57,048M — 10-K FY2025, p.44
  • Trailing-twelve-month net income$60,800M — Q3 FY2025 ($14.4B) + Q4 FY2025 ($13.0B) + Q1 FY2026 ($16.5B) + Q2 FY2026 ($16.9B), from each quarter's earnings call
  • 2020 net income$29,131M — 10-K FY2022, p.44 (Three-Year Summary)
  • 2020 revenue$119,951M — 10-K FY2022, p.44
  • 2025 revenue$182,447M — 10-K FY2025, p.44
  • Discount rate (WACC)9% base case (8% / 10% / 12% tested) — standard large stable-company default
  • Terminal growth rate2.5% — long-run GDP-level assumption

Model: net income (as the FCF-to-equity proxy) is assumed to grow at a constant annual rate g for 10 years, then at a 2.5% terminal rate thereafter — a two-stage dividend-discount-style model, solved by bisection for the value of g that equates present value to today's market capitalization. Net debt is not separately subtracted, given the bank-specific adjustment described above.

Normalization check: the three-year (2023–2025) average net income is $55.02B. FY2025 ($57.05B) is +3.7% above that average, and TTM ($60.8B) is +10.5% above it — both within the ±40% normalization threshold, so no adjustment was applied to either base case.

The fine print

This number is a starting point, not an answer
  • Change the discount rate, the income base, the projection window, or the terminal growth rate, and the answer moves — see the sensitivity table above.
  • A reverse DCF shows what the market currently expects — it does not say what the stock is "worth."
  • The bank-specific adjustment (net income in place of FCF, no net-debt subtraction) is an approximation, not the standard reverse-DCF formula.
  • Whether 3.4% growth is realistic — or overly conservative — depends on the interest-rate cycle, credit costs, and competitive dynamics, not on this math alone.
  • Any investment decision, and its outcome, is your own responsibility.
Built from JPMorgan Chase's 10-K filings (FY2021–FY2025), earnings call transcripts (Q3 FY2025–Q2 FY2026), and a web search for the current share price (stockanalysis.com, Aug 18, 2026). This tells you where to dig deeper — it is not a buy or sell signal.

Frequently asked questions

What growth rate does JPM's stock price assume?

At today's price, JPMorgan's stock is pricing in only about 3.4% annual net-income growth for the next ten years — well below what it has historically delivered.

How does that compare to JPMorgan's actual growth?

Over the past five years, JPMorgan's actual net income grew 14.4% a year — far above the ~3.4% the current price requires, suggesting the market is pricing in a significant slowdown.

What share price was used for this analysis?

This analysis used $360.84, as of Aug 18, 2026.